jump to navigation

Can a computer lecture better than a human? October 24, 2008

Posted by Jonathan Hewett in : delicious links , add a comment

Scott McLeod makes the case for covering the basics online. His example is a school assignment but his point has wider application:

"Don’t get me wrong. There’s still a lot of value in human teachers when it comes to explaining difficult concepts, working through students’ misconceptions, inspiring students to want to explore deeper, and so on. We’re not replaceable by robots and software just yet. But […]
There is a wealth of research showing that around 80 to 85 percent of classroom work is low-level factual and procedural work, exactly the kind of work that can easily be facilitated by the kinds of technology-mediated learning activities that I’ve alluded to this post. So why waste an expensive human on those things?"

Read more here [link]

Bookmark and Share

Bad Behavior has blocked 158 access attempts in the last 7 days.